Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for FLOWER POWER, serial 75430392, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOWER POWER
Serial 75430392 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Romero, Roger
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 039 -
Filed Feb 06, 1998

The record shows that the mark “FLOWER POWER” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Roger Romero, failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was applied for as a service mark on February 6, 1998 and was published for opposition on May 18, 1999. It covered retail store services, online retail store services, and mail order catalog services for electric appliances (Class 035) and utility services related to the transmission, distribution, and generation of electricity (Class 039). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same categories of electric appliance retail and electricity utility services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services listed. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment on August 11, 2002. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that the abandoned mark still signals that the owner once claimed rights in those specific services, so using the name in those areas could invite scrutiny.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search