Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VIVENDI, serial 75446273, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VIVENDISerial 75446273 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: VIVENDI
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 06, 1998
Registered Feb 08, 2000
The record shows that the VIVENDI mark, owned by VIVENDI (a corporation organized in France), was registered on the Principal Register in February 2000 but was cancelled on November 11 2006 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The registration covered a broad range of goods and services across classes 009 (telephone and related apparatus), 035 (advertising and business services), 036 (real‑estate services), 037‑042 (various construction, communication, utility, education, scientific and technology services). A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern for products or services that fall within any of those listed categories, especially telecommunications equipment or related business services. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “VIVENDI.” No enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the name for similar telecommunications or related services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.