Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TAIL WAGGING FUN DOG TRAINING, serial 75446328, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TAIL WAGGING FUN DOG TRAININGSerial 75446328 · Principal Register
Dead · Expired
Owner: Charlsen, Lyne
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 09, 1998
Registered Apr 20, 1999
The record shows that “TAIL WAGGING FUN DOG TRAINING” is a dead, expired service mark that was once registered on the Principal Register under class 041 for dog training services. The owner listed is Charlsen, Lyne, an individual organized in the United States. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but it does establish that the owner once claimed exclusive rights to that name for dog‑training services. The closest area of concern for a new user would be any business that offers dog‑training services, especially if the name is used in a similar manner. The prosecution history shows a straightforward registration path with no descriptiveness refusal or Supplemental Register movement. The last recorded maintenance event was the cancellation under Section 8 in 2009, after which the mark expired. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the expired status reduces the risk, but using the same name for dog‑training services could still raise a concern because the mark was once registered for that exact service.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.