Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AIR APPARENT, serial 75449517, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AIR APPARENTSerial 75449517 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Shah, Pankajkumar
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Mar 13, 1998
The record shows that the mark “AIR APPARENT” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Pankajkumar Shah, an individual. The abandoned application covered goods in classes 016 and 025, including paper goods such as letter‑size paper, posters, playing cards, and various printed materials, as well as clothing items like shirts, pants, jackets, and accessories. A similar name would raise the closest concern for uses that fall within those specific paper or clothing categories, especially if the goods are marketed under a similar style or for the same audience. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording “AIR APPARENT” in other contexts or classes. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed, assignment to an examiner, and eventual abandonment, with no enforcement actions recorded. The latest event is the abandonment on June 30, 1999. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is limited to the specific paper and clothing goods listed, but the mark’s dead status means there is no active registration to oppose.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.