Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NOVAFLOR, serial 75482441, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NOVAFLORSerial 75482441 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Bartolomei, Alberto S.
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed May 11, 1998
Registered Sep 21, 1999
The record shows that the mark “NOVAFLOR” is no longer active; it was cancelled on June 24 2006 because the owner, Alberto Bartolomei, did not file a required declaration. The mark had been registered on the Principal Register on September 21 1999 for pharmaceuticals, specifically liquid, tablet, capsule and injectable preparations of lactobacillus acidophilus and lactobacillus bulgaricus used to restore and maintain normal intestinal flora. Because the goods are narrowly defined, a similar name used for other products would raise a closer concern only if those products were also pharmaceutical preparations of the same bacteria. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “NOVAFLOR.” The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication, published for opposition, and then registered; no Supplemental Register steps are involved. The latest event was the cancellation in 2006, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces risk, but the specific pharmaceutical scope remains a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.