Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE'S, serial 75485947, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE'SSerial 75485947 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: FINANZ ST. HONORE, B.V.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Filed May 15, 1998
Registered Jul 16, 2002
The record shows that LOVE'S is a cancelled Principal Register mark (registration number 2594573) that was owned by FINANZ ST. HONORE, B.V., a corporation organized in the Netherlands, and the cancellation was entered on April 18 2009 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only two classes: Class 016 for stationery, pens and note cards, and Class 018 for backpacks, totes and wallets, so a later use of LOVE'S on those specific goods would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses on unrelated products fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word LOVE'S, and it is not on the Supplemental Register, so there is no supplemental‑register examination sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2009, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use LOVE'S for similar paper or bag items, but the risk is lower for dissimilar goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.