Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORES, serial 75492572, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORESSerial 75492572 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: ALIS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 21, 1998
Registered Jul 20, 1999
The record shows that the mark FLORES was registered on the Principal Register to Alis Technologies Inc., a Canadian corporation, but the registration was cancelled on April 22, 2006 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The only listed goods are “computer software for identification of language and character encoding, character set conversion, line breaking, hyphenation, word extraction and language sorting, and users’ manuals for use therewith sold as a unit” in International Class 009, meaning a similar name would raise the closest concern for software‑related products that process text or language data. The record does not give Alis Technologies control over every use of the word “Flores” in other fields. The prosecution history shows the application was filed in May 1998, approved for publication, and ultimately registered in July 1999 before the later cancellation; no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan software in the same technical area, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.