Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOONEY LENSES, serial 75498864, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOONEY LENSESSerial 75498864 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Fairfield Company, The
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jun 09, 1998
Registered Jul 13, 1999
The record shows that “LOONEY LENSES” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 2261063) owned by The Fairfield Company, a corporation organized in Iowa; the cancellation occurred on April 15, 2006 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only Class 009 “NOVELTY HOLOGRAPHIC SUNGLASSES,” with a first use date of May 13, 1998, so a similar name used for eyewear or related optical accessories would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Looney” or “Lenses.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from examiner assignment through approval, publication, registration, and the later Section 8 cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a holographic‑style sunglasses brand, but the risk drops for dissimilar goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.