Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PERCY P. NUT, serial 75509318, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PERCY P. NUTSerial 75509318 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Jun 26, 1998
The record shows that “PERCY P. NUT” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to file a required Statement of Use, with the abandonment entry dated Jan 15 2000, and no later activity appears. The owner listed is Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized in Missouri, and the filing was based on an intent‑to‑use claim. The only goods covered are “Breakfast cereal” in International Class 030, so a name that looks like “Percy P. Nut” would raise the closest record‑based concern if you’re marketing cereal or a closely related food product. The record does not give Ralcorp control over every possible use of the words “Percy,” “P.,” or “Nut” in other industries. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The prosecution history shows standard steps—examination, publication for opposition, notice of allowance—but ends with the abandonment, and the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to launch a cereal brand with a similar name, since the abandoned filing still signals a prior claim in that product space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.