Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PETAL PUSHERS, serial 75509716, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PETAL PUSHERSSerial 75509716 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Southern California District of the International Lutheran Laymen's League
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Jun 29, 1998
Registered Mar 28, 2000
The record shows that “PETAL PUSHERS” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register, owned by the Southern California District of the International Lutheran Laymen’s League, a California corporation. The mark covers ornamental ladel pins, printed booklets, programs, brochures, photographs, Christmas cards, and clothing such as hats, t‑shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, shirts and caps, all promoting float‑decorating services for annual floral pageants in Pasadena, California. A similar name would raise the closest concern for goods or services that are directly related to those promotional items or apparel linked to the same community event. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows the mark was examined, published for opposition, and ultimately registered on March 28, 2000, with no indication of a Supplemental Register sequence. The latest meaningful event is the renewal on March 25, 2020, and the record shows no enforcement actions. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that use in the same or closely related categories could be viewed as infringing the registered mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.