Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPERVAN, serial 75574401, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPERVANSerial 75574401 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Advanced EDI & Barcoding Corp
Class 038 - Communication Services
Filed Nov 06, 1998
Registered Jan 18, 2000
The record shows that the mark “PAPERVAN” was registered on the Principal Register on January 18, 2000, but the registration was cancelled on October 21, 2006 because the owner, Advanced EDI & Barcoding Corp, did not file a Section 8 declaration. The mark covered electronic data interchange services for the paper industry under class 038. Because the cancellation was due to a failure to maintain the registration, the mark no longer has enforceable rights, but the record still indicates that the owner once claimed exclusive use of that name for those specific services. The cancellation is the most recent meaningful status event; no further maintenance dates are listed. There are no oppositions, extensions, or other enforcement actions recorded. If you are thinking of using a similar name for services unrelated to electronic data interchange in the paper industry, the closest concern comes from this cancelled registration, but the record does not establish control over every use of the wording. The practical risk is that a similar name in the same or a closely related field could still trigger a review of this cancelled mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.