Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MANGOBUTTER, serial 75578053, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MANGOBUTTERSerial 75578053 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Fabrichem, Inc.
Class 001 -
Filed Oct 26, 1998
Registered Nov 16, 1999
The record shows that the mark “MANGOBUTTER” was once registered on the Principal Register but has since been cancelled. The owner was Fabrichem, Inc., a corporation organized in Connecticut. The mark covered mango seed extract used in cosmetics such as lipstick, skin creams, lotions, emollients, and moisturizers, with first use in commerce on January 1, 1998. Because the mark is cancelled, it no longer confers exclusive rights, but the historical registration still indicates that a similar name could raise the closest concern for products in the same cosmetic category. The record does not give control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods listed. The prosecution history shows a straightforward path: application filed in 1998, publication for opposition in 1999, registration in November 1999, and cancellation in August 2006 for failure to file a Section 8 declaration. No enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations beyond the cancellation itself appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk lies in the cosmetic products area where the cancelled mark once had protection.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.