Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for QUARRY HILLS, serial 75631653, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
QUARRY HILLSSerial 75631653 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Quarry Hills Associates Limited Partnership
Class 037 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 02, 1999
The record shows that “QUARRY HILLS” is not a live mark – it was abandoned on Dec 14 2002 because the applicant never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, so the application was cancelled and the status is listed as dead. The owner on file is Quarry Hills Associates Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership. The registration, had it survived, covered real‑estate development services for golf courses and country‑club facilities (class 037) and golf‑course and golf‑club services (class 041); a later applicant using a similar name in those same areas would encounter the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Quarry Hills” in unrelated fields. This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply reflects the standard notice‑of‑allowance and subsequent failure to submit use evidence. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on Dec 14 2002, and no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a golf‑related service or development under a similar name, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.