Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CINDERELLA, serial 75643250, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CINDERELLASerial 75643250 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: NGRID INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Filed Feb 18, 1999
Registered May 04, 2004
The record shows that the “CINDERELLA” mark is cancelled – the registration was voided on Nov 15, 2024 because the owner, NGRID INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED, did not file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, and the record is marked “Dead · Cancelled.” The mark was limited to Class 035 advertising and business services that promote and facilitate third‑party redevelopment and revitalization projects, Class 036 financial services that fund residential and commercial redevelopment, and Class 037 construction and repair services for renovating buildings and neighborhoods, all tied to low‑ and middle‑income housing. A similar name used in any of those specific areas would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those descriptions are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “Cinderella.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only routine filings, extensions, and renewals until the cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or court actions, so no enforcement signal is visible. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a brand in the same redevelopment, financing or construction space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.