Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DREAM WITH YOUR EYES WIDE OPEN, serial 75650282, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DREAM WITH YOUR EYES WIDE OPENSerial 75650282 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: MATTEL, INC.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 006 -
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Filed Feb 26, 1999
The record shows that the mark “DREAM WITH YOUR EYES WIDE OPEN” is dead, having been abandoned after a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The owner listed is Mattel, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The mark was registered on the Principal Register under intent‑to‑use and covered a wide array of goods, including cosmetics, cleaning products, metal items, kitchenware, electrical and scientific apparatus, lighting fixtures, bicycles, jewelry, paper goods, bags, bedding, clothing, toys, food, and beverages. A similar name would raise the closest concern for goods or services that overlap with any of those categories, especially cosmetics or toys. The abandonment does not mean the wording is free for all uses; it only removes that specific registration. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict with Mattel’s abandoned mark in the listed goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.