Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELEANOR, serial 75665273, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELEANORSerial 75665273 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: CHURCHILL SOFTWARE INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Mar 22, 1999
Registered Feb 29, 2000
The record shows that the mark ELEANOR was registered on the Principal Register (Reg. 2324306) to Churchill Software Inc., a Michigan corporation, but the registration was cancelled on Dec 2 2006 because the owner failed to file a proper Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The only listed goods are “computer software for use in forecasting consumer demand of promoted goods” in International Class 009, meaning a similar name would raise the closest concern if you’re offering software that predicts consumer buying patterns or related analytical tools. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Eleanor” in other industries or contexts. The prosecution history shows the application was filed in March 1999, approved for publication, and ultimately registered in February 2000 before the later cancellation; there is no indication of oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if your product falls within the same software forecasting niche, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.