Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JAGUAR, serial 75684253, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JAGUARSerial 75684253 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: HOYA PHOTONICS, INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Apr 16, 1999
Registered May 14, 2002
The record shows a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 2570362) for the mark JAGUAR owned by HOYA PHOTONICS, INC., a California corporation; the cancellation was entered on Feb 21 2009 because the owner failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only Class 009 – “LASERS FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS, EXCLUDING IN VIVO MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS,” with a first use date of Mar 23 2001, so a similar name used on laser equipment or related scientific apparatus would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give HOYA control over every use of the word JAGUAR, especially in unrelated goods or services. The prosecution history shows the mark progressed through normal examination, received a Notice of Allowance, was allowed on the Principal Register, and later was cancelled for non‑filing of the Section 8 maintenance. No opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement action appears in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market laser‑related scientific devices under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.