Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for XCELL, serial 75704299, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
XCELLSerial 75704299 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Litton Systems, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 13, 1999
The record shows that the mark “XCELL” is dead and was abandoned by Litton Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register for class 009, covering high‑density electronic signal connectors such as modular plugs and sockets used to interconnect printed circuit boards for data transmission in computers, telecommunications, and electronic equipment. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same technical field of electronic connectors and related data‑signal components. This history does not give the owner control over every use of the word “XCELL” in other industries. The prosecution history shows the applicant received a Notice of Allowance, filed and received two extensions, but ultimately abandoned the application. No opposition, cancellation, or enforcement activity appears in the supplied record. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status suggests a lower risk, but the specific goods listed still present a focused concern in the electronic connector market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.