Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAILING DEFENSE, serial 75704633, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAILING DEFENSESerial 75704633 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: RANDALL PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed May 13, 1999
The record shows that the application for “SAILING DEFENSE” filed by RANDALL PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, a California corporation, was abandoned on September 22 2000 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance was issued, so the mark is not live or registered. The only goods listed are “cosmetics, namely, sunscreens and sunblocks” in International Class 3, meaning a similar name would raise the closest concern for products in the sunscreen or sunblock market. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “sailing” or “defense” in other industries. The prosecution history shows the application moved through standard examination steps, received a Notice of Allowance on March 21 2000, and then was abandoned for lack of use. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a sunscreen brand with a similar name, because the abandoned filing still signals a prior claim in that product space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.