Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS, serial 75706009, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUSSerial 75706009 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Manage by Measures, LLC
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed May 12, 1999
Registered Feb 13, 2001
The record shows that ONEPLUS is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by Manage by Measures, LLC, with the cancellation entered on November 17 2007 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only Class 016 paper goods and printed matter – specifically printed manuals, books, guide books, workbooks, exercise books and other instructional materials dealing with group formation, conflict, communication, dynamics, decision‑making and general management topics. A similar name used on comparable educational or training publications would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated product categories fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word ONEPLUS, and the mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register, so there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market printed instructional materials under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.