Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENONE, serial 75727739, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENONESerial 75727739 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: I/G Enterprises, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 14, 1999
The record shows that “OPENONE” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on February 26 2003 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and no later filing has revived it; the owner listed is I/G Enterprises, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. The filing covered Class 009 computer software for cataloging, transmitting and storing electronic mail, e‑commerce transaction tracking, communications and groupware software, plus related utilities and manuals, and Class 042 computer consulting, programming, web‑site hosting and design services for global information networks. Because the protection was limited to those software‑related goods and services, a similar name used in a different field would be farther from the scope shown here, though a name applied to comparable email or e‑commerce software could raise a record‑based concern. The prosecution history shows only examiner assignments and a non‑final action before the abandonment; there are no oppositions, cancellations or court actions recorded. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a mark in the same software or tech‑service space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.