Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DIMOND RHODESIAN RIDGEBACKS, serial 75780797, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DIMOND RHODESIAN RIDGEBACKSSerial 75780797 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Gordon, Sandra J.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 19, 1999
Registered Mar 20, 2001
The record shows a cancelled registration – the mark “DIMOND RHODESIAN RIDGEBACKS” was owned by Sandra J. Gordon, an individual, and was removed from the Principal Register on Dec 22 2007 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. The registration covered two specific services: showing and handling Rhodesian Ridgeback dogs for others (Class 041) and breeding Rhodesian Ridgeback dogs for others (Class 042). A similar name used in any context involving dog shows, handling, or breeding of that breed would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses unrelated to those services fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Rhodesian Ridgebacks” or “Dimond.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval to registration and then cancellation under Section 8. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by a third party, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer dog‑showing or breeding services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.