Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SECUREKEY, serial 75806753, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SECUREKEYSerial 75806753 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: CBL Worldkey LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 22, 1999
The record shows that “SECUREKEY” is not a live mark – it was abandoned on November 2 2000 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is CBL Worldkey LLC, a Delaware corporation. The application covered magnetic coded cards and non‑magnetic cards (class 009 and 016), as well as a range of internet‑based services such as business information, consultation, information certification, financial information, verification and general scientific‑technology information services (classes 035, 036 and 042). A similar name used for any of those types of cards or online information services would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “SECUREKEY.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply notes the examiner assignment and a non‑final action before the abandonment. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same card or internet‑information service space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.