Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KUNOICHI, serial 75852736, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KUNOICHISerial 75852736 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Aruma Baba Giken
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Nov 18, 1999
The record shows that KUNOICHI is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the applicant, Kabushiki Kaisha Aruma Baba Giken, failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment dated Aug 22 2002. The filing, made under an intent‑to‑use basis on Nov 18 1999, listed goods in International Class 009 covering computer protection systems, various electronic circuits, magnetic and optical discs, and related computer hardware and software for network security. Because the record only covers those technical computer‑related items, a similar name used for unrelated products such as clothing, food, or services outside the computer‑security arena would be farther from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The prosecution history shows a series of examiner assignments and a non‑final action in May 2000 before the final abandonment, but no supplemental‑register filing appears. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market security‑related software or hardware under a similar name, but the risk drops sharply for dissimilar goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.