Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HOP ROX, serial 75897624, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HOP ROXSerial 75897624 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Severson, Robert G.
Class 028 -
Filed Jan 18, 2000
Registered Dec 21, 2004
The record shows that HOP ROX is a cancelled Principal Register mark; the registration was cancelled on July 22 2011 because the owner, Robert G. Severson, did not file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, and the status is listed as “dead · Cancelled.” The only goods listed are “recreational equipment, namely, discs adapted to be spaced apart for hopping games” in International Class 028, with a first use date of October 7 2003. Because the protection is limited to that specific type of hopping‑game disc, a similar name used for unrelated products—say, apparel or food—would be farther from the scope of this record, though the wording itself is still on file. The prosecution history shows the mark moved through examination, received a Notice of Allowance, was allowed on the Principal Register, and later failed the Section 8 maintenance filing, leading to cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market hopping‑game equipment under a similar name, but the risk drops for other categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.