Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PURPLE, serial 75923994, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PURPLESerial 75923994 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Fast Multimedia, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Feb 22, 2000
The record shows that the “PURPLE” application is dead – it was abandoned on Oct 17 2002 because the applicant never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and no extension was later filed. The owner listed is Fast Multimedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the only goods covered are “computer hardware and software used to edit video images and audio recordings, and instruction manuals sold as a unit” in International Class 009. A similar name used for anything in that same technical field would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside of video‑editing hardware or software are farther from the scope shown. Because the registration was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history simply reflects the abandonment rather than any supplemental filing. The latest meaningful event in the file is the abandonment entry; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a name tied to video‑editing tools, but the record does not block unrelated uses.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.