Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONE-AT-A-TIME, serial 75925943, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONE-AT-A-TIMESerial 75925943 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Xerox Corporation
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 22, 2000
The record shows that the mark “ONE‑AT‑A‑TIME” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Xerox Corporation, did not file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was originally filed as a service mark on February 22, 2000, and was published for opposition on January 1, 2002. It was allowed on March 26, 2002, but the abandonment occurred on February 13, 2003. The goods and services listed are business services in the nature of document reproduction, document creation and document management (Class 035) and printing services (Class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in these two classes, especially where the services involve document handling or printing. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, and no enforcement activity is visible in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment in 2003. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that the abandoned mark still exists in the USPTO database and could create confusion in the same or closely related services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.