Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOTONE, serial 75926099, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOTONESerial 75926099 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Remote Data Systems, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Feb 23, 2000
Registered Jan 07, 2003
The record shows that ECOTONE is a cancelled Principal Register trademark (status “dead”) owned by Remote Data Systems, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and that the registration was terminated on August 9 2013 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The registration covered Class 009 “electrical & scientific apparatus,” specifically measuring and recording instruments for sensing environmental conditions such as water levels, precipitation, barometric pressure, temperature, wind speed and direction, water quality, humidity, solar radiation, and the associated operating software. A similar name used for comparable environmental‑monitoring devices or software would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word ECOTONE. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the normal examination and renewal steps leading to the eventual cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same environmental‑instrument market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.