Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WORDTRAINERS, serial 75935564, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WORDTRAINERSSerial 75935564 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Ronni, Geist, F
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 17, 2000
The record shows that WORDTRAINERS is an abandoned service mark; the application was filed by Ronni Geist F as an individual on Feb 17 2000, received a Notice of Allowance on Feb 20 2001, but was abandoned on Aug 21 2001 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed. The only goods and services listed are in class 041 and cover “training in the use of computer software; educational services, namely conducting seminars, conferences, and workshops in the fields of writing/editing, document design, word processing, and presentation software, and distribution of course materials in connection therewith.” A similar name would be most concerning if used for comparable software‑training or related educational offerings, since that is the precise scope the record reflects. The abandonment means the USPTO record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “WORDTRAINERS.” The prosecution history shows the usual steps—examination, amendment, publication for opposition, allowance, and then abandonment—but no supplemental‑register filing. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on Aug 21 2001, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to offer software‑training services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.