Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BRUNO BANANI, serial 76059253, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BRUNO BANANISerial 76059253 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: bruno banani underwear GmbH
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 024 -
Class 028 -
Filed May 30, 2000
Registered Nov 30, 2004
The record shows that “BRUNO BANANI” is a live Principal Register registration (serial 76059253, registration 2905413) owned by bruno banani underwear GmbH, a German company, and it has been renewed as of the May 1 2014 status date. The active goods and services are listed in class 003 (perfume, essential oils and body‑care lotions), class 014 (jewelry, costume jewelry, watches and clocks) and class 018 (leather and imitation‑leather items such as handbags, purses, wallets and umbrellas); other classes in the filing have been cancelled. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for products that fall within those categories, because the USPTO record ties the mark specifically to those items. The registration does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “BRUNO BANANI” in unrelated fields. The most recent meaningful event is the 10‑year renewal filing and acceptance on May 1 2014; no later maintenance or renewal date is provided. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market cosmetics, jewelry or leather accessories under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.