Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENTIDE, serial 76094191, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENTIDESerial 76094191 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: OpenTide Korea Corporation
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 24, 2000
Registered Oct 24, 2006
The record shows that “OPENTIDE” is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by OpenTide Korea Corporation; the cancellation was entered on May 31 2013 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration, and the mark is now dead. The registration covered computer‑software and e‑commerce applications (Class 009), online business‑strategy and advertising services (Class 035), and design, installation and consulting for software systems and related technology services (Class 042). A similar name used for any of those types of software, online consulting, advertising or technology services would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “OPENTIDE.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval to registration and then to cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by a third party or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same software‑or‑technology service space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.