Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WINWIN TEACHERS, serial 76107731, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WINWIN TEACHERSSerial 76107731 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Scholastic Inc.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Aug 11, 2000
The record shows that WINWIN TEACHERS, owned by Scholastic Inc., is not a live mark – the application was abandoned on March 29 2002 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the status is listed as “dead” and “refused.” The only goods and services listed are “providing professional development services to teachers and education administrators via in-person consultation and via a global computer network” in International Class 041, so a similar name used for teacher training or related educational consulting would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Scholastic control over every use of the words “WINWIN” or “TEACHERS” in unrelated fields. Because the mark never reached registration, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on March 29 2002, and no further maintenance or renewal dates appear. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to offer teacher‑development services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.