Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGONBALL Z, serial 76109049, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGONBALL ZSerial 76109049 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: TOEI ANIMATION CO., LTD.
Class 011 -
Class 014 -
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Aug 10, 2000
Registered Mar 12, 2002
The record shows that “DRAGONBALL Z” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 2546465) owned by TOEI ANIMATION CO., LTD., with the cancellation dated Dec 20 2008 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The registration covered a wide range of goods across many classes, including lamp reflectors and night lights (Class 011), jewelry and watches (Class 014), luggage and backpacks (Class 018), a large assortment of furniture and related accessories (Class 020), beverageware and paper‑plastic dinnerware (Class 021), bedding textiles such as pillowcases and blankets (Class 024), and various foods like cakes, candy, ice cream and snack items (Class 030). A similar name used for products in any of those categories would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those listed areas are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Dragonball Z.” No prosecution history or opposition activity appears, and the supplied history shows no enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for comparable goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.