Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NATURAL FLOWERS, serial 76170741, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NATURAL FLOWERSSerial 76170741 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Donald Bruce & Co.
Class 014 -
Filed Nov 22, 2000
The record shows that “NATURAL FLOWERS” is an abandoned application, listed as dead after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment dated March 24 2002; the owner on file is Donald Bruce & Co., a corporation organized in Illinois. The only goods listed are religious and fashion jewelry—including men’s, children’s, lockets, necklaces, bracelets, earrings, pendants, rings, key rings and hair accessories—so a similar name used for any of those items would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. Because the filing never reached registration, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “natural flowers.” The prosecution history shows an examiner assignment, a non‑final action mailed, an unresponsive duplicate paper, and finally abandonment, but no supplemental register filing appears. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on March 24 2002, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan jewelry under a similar name, especially in the same classes.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.