Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE POWER TO DO ANYTHING, serial 76172842, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE POWER TO DO ANYTHINGSerial 76172842 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ENMAX CORPORATION
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Nov 27, 2000
The record shows that “THE POWER TO DO ANYTHING” is not a live mark – it was abandoned on March 25 2002 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is ENMAX CORPORATION, a Canadian corporation. The application covered a range of energy‑related services, including audits of energy usage, utility billing and online sales of energy products (class 035); maintenance of electrical equipment, parking‑lot and street lighting, and security‑lighting services (class 037); design, installation and leasing of video‑teleconferencing and data‑transmission networks, backup power and long‑distance telephone services (class 038); distribution and sale of electricity and natural gas, plus related equipment rentals and meter‑reading (class 039); generation of electrical power (class 040); and consulting on energy management, power generation and safety codes (class 042). Because the mark never entered the register, the record does not give ENMAX control over every use of the phrase, but a similar name used in any of those listed energy‑service contexts would raise the closest record‑based concern. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed in June 2001 and an examiner assignment in May 2001, ending with the abandonment. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in the same energy‑service fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.