Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for INSIDEOUT TECHNOLOGIES, serial 76176047, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INSIDEOUT TECHNOLOGIESSerial 76176047 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: American Management Systems, Incorporated
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 05, 2000
The record shows that INSIDEOUT TECHNOLOGIES is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal, with the abandonment dated Nov 25 2002, and the owner listed as American Management Systems, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation. The filing covered Class 042 services: computer services such as integration of systems and networks, computer consultation and software design for credit collections, customer relationship management and loan originations, all in the financial, insurance and telecommunications fields. A similar name used for those kinds of technology and data‑processing services would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. Because the mark never entered the register, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “InsideOut” or “Technologies.” The prosecution history shows a final refusal mailed on Mar 25 2001, a non‑final action in April 2001, and the ultimate abandonment in November 2002; no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable tech‑service brand in the same financial‑services niche.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.