Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FIRSTWHIFF, serial 76180579, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FIRSTWHIFFSerial 76180579 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: DigiScents, Inc.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 13, 2000
The record shows that FIRSTWHIFF is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after DigiScents, Inc., a Delaware corporation, failed to answer an Office action, with the abandonment dated February 1 2002. The only goods and services listed are a customer‑rewards program that gives advanced access to news, information, demonstrations and promotions in the field of digital scent technology, filed under class 042. A similar name would raise the closest concern if you’re offering a digital‑scent‑related service or rewards program, because the record’s protection is limited to that specific description. The record does not give DigiScents control over every use of the word “firstwhiff” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed on May 10 2001, assignment to an examiner on May 16 2001, and the final abandonment on February 1 2002; no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable digital‑scent service, but the risk fades for unrelated goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.