Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CURSOR, serial 76191665, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CURSORSerial 76191665 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Cambridge Positioning Systems Limited
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 09, 2001
Registered Apr 27, 2004
The record shows that the mark “CURSOR” was registered on the Principal Register on April 27, 2004, but it was cancelled under Section 8 on December 3, 2010 because the registrant, Cambridge Positioning Systems Limited, failed to file a declaration. The cancelled registration covered classes 016, 035, 038, and 041, which include printed materials, business information services, telecommunications, and educational services all related to radio‑location, radio‑tracking, and radio‑navigation. A similar name would raise the closest concern for uses in those same areas, especially where the goods or services involve tracking or navigation technology or related instructional materials. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “cursor.” No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations beyond the Section 8 cancellation appear in the supplied history. The latest meaningful event is the cancellation itself; no further dates are listed. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled registration still signals that the owner once claimed rights in a fairly narrow technical niche, so caution is warranted when entering that field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.