Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OBSESSED WITH QUALITY, serial 76197374, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OBSESSED WITH QUALITYSerial 76197374 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Sargent Manufacturing Company
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jan 22, 2001
Registered Jun 03, 2003
The record shows that “OBSESSED WITH QUALITY” was registered on the Principal Register in 2003 but was cancelled in 2010 because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The owner was Sargent Manufacturing Company, a Delaware corporation. The cancelled registration covered metal hardware for doors, metal locks, door closers, and a range of electrical and electro‑mechanical door‑locking devices in classes 006, 007 and 009. A similar name would raise the closest concern for businesses dealing with door hardware, locks, or related electrical security systems, since those goods are exactly what the mark once protected. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the phrase, only over those specific goods. No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the cancellation in January 2010. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk lies in the door‑hardware and lock market, where the cancelled mark still signals a prior claim.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.