Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for COOKIE BLOOMERS, serial 76220397, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
COOKIE BLOOMERS
Serial 76220397 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled

Owner: DCAPOZZO, LLC
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Mar 05, 2001
Registered May 27, 2003

This record shows that the mark “COOKIE BLOOMERS” was once registered on the Principal Register but has since been cancelled. The owner listed is DCAPOZZO, LLC, a limited liability company organized in Connecticut. The registration covered the specific goods of “COOKIES AND COOKIES FORMED TO SIMULATE FLOWERS” in class 030, with use in commerce beginning in November 1990. Because the mark is cancelled, it no longer provides enforceable rights, but the record still indicates that the owner once claimed protection for that particular type of cookie. A similar name that refers to the same or very similar cookie products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while a name used for unrelated goods would be farther from the scope shown. The record shows no opposition, cancellation, or court activity beyond the Section 8 cancellation, and no further maintenance or renewal dates are supplied. For someone looking to use a similar name, the cancelled status suggests that the owner no longer maintains the mark, but the historical claim could still be a point of caution if the same cookie products are involved.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search