Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LEARN IT, LOVE IT, LIVE IT, serial 76228606, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LEARN IT, LOVE IT, LIVE ITSerial 76228606 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Alexander, James Sidney
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 22, 2001
The record shows that the mark “LEARN IT, LOVE IT, LIVE IT” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, James Sidney Alexander, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was filed on March 22, 2001 and was published for opposition on June 25, 2002, with a Notice of Allowance issued on September 17, 2002. The goods covered are extensive paper goods and printed matter in Class 016, including items such as cardboard sunscreens for automobiles, trading cards, bumper stickers, posters, stickers, decals, rub‑on decorative transfers, bookmarks, score cards, printed paper signs, writing pads, note pads, coloring books, agenda organizers, sports books, magazines, newsletters, souvenir programs, autograph books, book covers, wall calendars, desk calendars, playing cards, gift wrapping paper, paper gift boxes, and related items. The mark also covers providing television, radio, and print advertising services in Class 035. Because the record is on the Principal Register, it signals that the owner once had a federally registered claim over those specific goods and services. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be using the phrase on paper goods or advertising services similar to those listed; the record does not preclude use in unrelated categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.