Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SYSTEM ONEPLUS, serial 76259078, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SYSTEM ONEPLUSSerial 76259078 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Amadeus Global Travel Distribution S.A.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 18, 2001
The record shows the mark SYSTEM ONEPLUS is dead – it was abandoned on July 13 2006 after the owner, Amadeus Global Travel Distribution S.A., failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance, and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice. The only goods listed are “computer software for a computerized reservation system to permit interaction between personal computers and a host computer” in International Class 009, so a similar name used in reservation‑system software would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated fields fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “SYSTEM” or “ONEPLUS.” This was a Principal Register application, not a Supplemental Register filing, and the prosecution history reflects only the standard allowance and subsequent extensions of time to submit a Statement of Use before the final abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signals appear. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market reservation‑type software under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.