Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGONKILLER SWORD, serial 76296187, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGONKILLER SWORDSerial 76296187 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: KONAMI CORPORATION
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 028 -
Filed Aug 08, 2001
The record shows the mark DRAGONKILLER SWORD is abandoned, not live or registered, and the owner listed is KONAMI CORPORATION, a corporation organized in Japan. The filing covered computer‑related gaming products (class 009 such as video game programs, cartridges, CD‑ROMs and joysticks), printed game‑related materials (class 016 including strategy guide books, magazines, posters, trading cards and stationery) and physical game equipment and toys (class 028 covering stand‑alone video game machines, handheld units, board and card games, dice, chips, action figures and dolls). A similar name used for any of those gaming‑focused goods would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that scope would be farther from what the record actually protects. Because the application was abandoned after the Notice of Allowance, the record does not give KONAMI control over every possible use of the words “Dragonkiller Sword.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment status dated May 13 2003, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for video‑game or related merchandise.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.