Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSS, serial 76343769, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSSSerial 76343769 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: HUGO BOSS TRADE MARKS MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 024 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Dec 03, 2001
Registered Jan 20, 2004
The record shows that the mark “BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSS” is dead and cancelled on the Principal Register, with the owner listed as HUGO BOSS TRADE MARKS MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG, a limited partnership organized in Germany. The cancellation occurred because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration, and the last status update was on August 22, 2014. The mark covered a wide range of goods and services, including cosmetics and cleaning products, electrical apparatus such as spectacles, precious‑metal jewelry, paper goods, leather goods, furniture, textiles, and retail store services for clothing and personal care items. A new name that is very similar would raise the closest concern in those same categories, especially cosmetics, jewelry, and retail services. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording, and no enforcement actions or oppositions are visible in the supplied history. Because the mark is cancelled, the risk of conflict is lower, but the same goods and services remain a potential area of concern if a similar name is used.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.