Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPTIQUE VIVENDI, serial 76352371, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPTIQUE VIVENDISerial 76352371 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Italee Optics, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Dec 26, 2001
Registered Dec 02, 2003
The record shows that OPTIQUE VIVENDI is a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. 2789447) owned by Italee Optics, Inc., a California corporation; the cancellation was entered on July 10, 2010 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only Class 009 goods – eyewear such as eyeglasses and sunglasses, their cases, and a cleaning cloth – so a later user of the same wording in the same or a closely related optical‑accessory market would encounter the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of “OPTIQUE” or “VIVENDI” in unrelated fields. Because the mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to explain. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar eyewear under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.