Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for AU NOM DE LA ROSE, serial 76371542, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AU NOM DE LA ROSE
Serial 76371542 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: D R
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 026 -
Class 031 -
Filed Feb 15, 2002

The record shows that “AU NOM DE LA ROSE” is an abandoned application, not a live registration, and the listed owner is D R, a corporation organized in France; the abandonment was entered on Jan 14 2004 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The filing covered Class 003 cosmetics and perfume, Class 026 artificial flowers, and Class 031 seeds for flowers and plants, live flowers and living plants, so a later use of the same wording on similar beauty‑care, artificial‑flower, or horticultural products would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “AU NOM DE LA ROSE” in unrelated fields. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never reached Supplemental status, the prosecution history simply reflects an initial allowance, a non‑final action, and the final abandonment, with no later maintenance events. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark in the same product categories.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search