Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GARDEN BLOOMERS, serial 76387326, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GARDEN BLOOMERSSerial 76387326 · Supplemental Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Takao, Danny H.
Class 031 -
Filed Mar 26, 2002
Registered Dec 17, 2002
The record shows that “GARDEN BLOOMERS” is a dead mark that was cancelled because the owner, Danny H. Takao, did not file a required declaration. The mark was registered on the Supplemental Register on December 17, 2002 for the single class 031, which covers live plants. The prosecution history indicates the mark was approved for registration on the Supplemental Register after a non‑final action in July 2002, and the cancellation occurred on July 25, 2009 under Section 8. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations after publication appear in the supplied history. Because the mark was only on the Supplemental Register, it does not grant exclusive rights to the wording in all contexts, but it does signal that the owner had some protection for live‑plant sales. A similar name used for live plants would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown. The practical risk for someone considering a similar name is that the cancelled status removes the owner’s active protection, but the historical registration still suggests that the wording was once considered distinctive for live plants.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.