Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 76445508, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 76445508 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 29, 2002
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was registered on the Principal Register and covered a wide range of goods and services, including jewelry items such as bracelets, rings, and watches (Class 014), a broad array of construction and repair services (Class 037), various communication services such as cable television and cellular telephone services (Class 038), and scientific and technology services like computer programming and architectural design (Class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same classes, especially where the goods or services overlap. The record does not grant control over every use of the word “Samsung.” No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history, so the owner has not shown any visible enforcement activity. The latest event is the abandonment notice mailed on February 8, 2007. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad goods and services listed still present a meaningful concern if used in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.