Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 76445509, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNG
Serial 76445509 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 29, 2002

The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead and was owned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. The application was filed on August 29, 2002 and abandoned on September 24, 2006 because no Statement of Use or Extension Request was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered a wide range of services in classes 037, 038 and 042, including building and construction services, communication services such as cable television and cellular telephone service, and scientific and technology services such as computer programming and architectural design. A similar name would raise the closest concern for use in those same service categories, especially in construction, communication, or technology fields. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “SAMSUNG.” No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice in November 2006. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of confusion in construction, communication, or technology services.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search