Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HEAVEN ON EARTH TOMORROW'S WORLD TODAY, serial 76487901, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HEAVEN ON EARTH TOMORROW'S WORLD TODAYSerial 76487901 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Heaven on Earth
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Filed Feb 06, 2003
The record shows that the application for “HEAVEN ON EARTH TOMORROW'S WORLD TODAY” was filed by Heaven on Earth, a California corporation, on February 6 2003 but was abandoned on March 21 2004 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, so the mark is not live or registered. The filing covered a range of food‑related goods in classes 029, 030, 031 and 032, including preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, nuts, jellies, jams, salad dressings, meats, fish, poultry, eggs, milk products, coffee, tea, sugar, cocoa, cereals, breads, confectioneries, fresh fruit and vegetables, seeds, flowers, snack foods, water and other beverages. A similar name used for any of those food or beverage products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that scope would be farther removed but still not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history only shows the non‑final action mailed on July 26 2003, assignment to an examiner on July 28 2003, and the abandonment in March 2004; no enforcement actions or oppositions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name for food or drink items, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO considered the wording in that context.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.